SCREEN ADDICTION SOLUTIONS
Original Research, Clinical Recovery & Global Expansion
Our work reveals the addiction-driven neurofunctional mechanisms behind screen-related symptoms —
scientific and therapeutic breakthroughs developed through our own research and clinical practice.
Screen addiction leads to profound neurodevelopmental and neurofunctional disruption, resulting in severe clinical symptoms.
Screen Addiction
Screen addiction leads to severe disturbances in brain and nervous system function, with earlier onset resulting in more significant impairments and more severe symptoms. People of all ages are affected, slowly and gradually. These disturbances alter one’s way of life, leading to reduced adaptability, impaired learning ability, cognitive problems, psychosomatic disorders, lower ambitions, and diminished outcomes.
Biomarkers:
Altered brain activity: slowing (theta/alpha peaks) in early onset (< 12 years) and acceleration (beta1/beta2 bursts) in later onset (> 35 years).
Inverted hemispheric asymmetry, with dominant alpha and/or theta rhythms in the left hemisphere.
Significant increase in alpha and/or theta amplitudes with eyes closed.
“Functional fragmentation” — each brain region exhibits its own dominant frequency pattern and spectral parameter, especially in onset at 0–2 years.
High local coherence but low trans-cortical coherence — disrupted neural connectivity, particularly in early onset.
Autonomic dysregulation: the cortex appears to “sleep” during screen exposure.
-
Age-Specific Patterns
Ages 0–2
-
developmental arrest
-
loss of acquired skills
-
severe language delay
-
sensory disorganization
Ages 3–6
-
speech disruptions
-
behavioural lability
-
early spectrum-like patterns
Ages 7–12
-
learning difficulties
-
executive dysfunction
-
attention disruption
Teens
-
occipital instability
-
headaches, anxiety
-
circadian disturbances
Adults (>35)
-
chronic fatigue
-
autonomic dysregulation
-
cognitive slowdown or overactivation
-
sleep–anxiety cycles
-
Symptoms
Language & Cognitive Development
Screen addiction disrupts the foundational rhythms of brain development, leading to:
-
delayed or regressed speech
-
reduced verbal comprehension
-
impaired symbolic and meaningful communication
-
difficulties with sequencing, reasoning, and problem-solving
-
weak working memory and fragmented information integration
Attention, Behaviour & Executive Function
Children and adults commonly show:
-
severe inattention and distractibility
-
hyperactive or hypoactive behaviour
-
impulsivity and poor inhibition
-
emotional instability and frequent meltdowns
-
rigid, repetitive or stereotypical behaviours
Sensory Processing Disruption
Early screen addiction creates deep sensory–integrative disorganization:
-
visual overstimulation or avoidance
-
auditory hypersensitivity or low responsiveness
-
vestibular instability
-
poor proprioception
-
difficulty integrating multisensory input
Motor, Vestibular & Coordination Symptoms
Neurofunctional destabilisation manifests through:
-
delayed motor milestones
-
unstable balance and coordination
-
pathological vestibular reflexes (SIPVR)
-
tics, tremors, motor agitation
-
disrupted body–gravity orientation and postural control
Social & Emotional Functioning
Screen-induced neurotrauma leads to:
-
reduced eye contact
-
weak reciprocal interaction
-
diminished social curiosity
-
emotional withdrawal
-
low frustration tolerance
Sleep & Autonomic Regulation
Screens disrupt circadian and regulatory systems, causing:
-
irregular sleep cycles
-
difficulty falling or staying asleep
-
autonomic instability
-
heightened arousal and reduced restorative states
Visual & Neurological Symptoms
Often observed:
-
high occipital alpha amplitudes
-
photic sensitivity
-
episodic epileptiform discharges
-
visual overload or avoidance
Early screen addiction
Early screen addiction (ages 0–3) disrupts the fundamental development of the brain, particularly in sensory integration, language acquisition, sleep patterns, and the formation of mirror neuron systems.
Functional regression and fragmentation of cognitive processes continue and intensify with age if the addiction is not interrupted.
A universal behavioral pattern emerges, marked by rigidity, stereotypies, avoidance of human interaction, and fixation on repetitive, predictable stimulation.
These symptoms are frequently misdiagnosed as ASD, ADHD, or ODD, masking the true underlying cause.
Disrupted parental attachment, along with anxiety and depression in parents, worsens the child’s prognosis.
Recovery is possible, especially in children under the age of 9, if a screen addiction therapy is combined with complete digital detox.
Screen Trauma
in Adults
(when screens are removed, the symptoms do not improve significantly)
Screen trauma in adults manifests as persistent neurophysiological dysfunction even after cessation of screen over-use. Adults with screen trauma present with:
-
chronic autonomic dysregulation (e.g., low HRV, heightened sympathetic tone)
-
rigid cortical patterns, “cortical sleep” during digital exposure, and reduced neuroplasticity
-
executive function decline, emotional lability, sensory hypersensitivity, disrupted reward processing
-
behavioural migration: from screen-seeking to other compulsive behaviours, acceptance of addiction as baseline.
The therapeutic trajectory for adults requires a multimodal approach: screen detoxification alone is insufficient. Effective therapy includes biofeedback, cortical re-awakening protocols, sensorimotor reintegration, autonomic regulation, and reconstruction of self-regulatory networks.
Clinical significance: Without this targeted intervention, adults risk long-term disability, reduced resilience to stress, and entrenched addictions.
Screen Trauma
in Children
(when screens are removed, the symptoms do not improve significantly)
In children, screen trauma is more acute, developmental in nature and impacts neuro-system maturation. Key features include:
-
early onset of screen over-use leads to cortical fragmentation, sensory-motor disintegration, mirror-neuron suppression, and disruption in attachment networks
-
rapid emergence of autism-like symptoms, language regression, impaired social learning, sensory-motor delays
-
autonomic dysregulation, cue-dependency, pathologic reflexes, high vulnerability during the 0-3 year critical window
Therapeutic trajectory in children involves: full screen detox, sequential sensorimotor and neuro-developmental rehabilitation, parent-child neuro-regulation support (including parental autonomic stabilisation). Successful programmes have achieved full recovery of development and elimination of severe symptoms.
Clinical significance: Early intervention is crucial — the younger the onset, the more profound the damage and the longer the recovery cycle.
Screen-Induced Pathological Vestibular Reflex
A pathological vestibular reflex observed almost universally in children with early screen addiction. When the child is placed in a tilted, inverted, or unstable body position, an automatic reaction appears — panic, backward extension, motor disequilibrium, tremor, or intense discomfort. The response is reflexive and neurofunctional, not emotional or voluntary.
Neurofunctional Disruption
SIPVR reflects a breakdown of vestibular integration, postural control, and body–gravity orientation caused by early screen addiction. It does not appear in typically developing children and functions as a specific marker of screen-induced neurotrauma.
Clinical Significance
The reflex shows strong associations with autistic-like features, sensory processing disruptions, motor instability, and delayed neurodevelopment. Its presence provides a new diagnostic window into the developmental impact of early screen addiction.
Therapeutic Trajectory
SIPVR resolves fully only after structured therapy that includes screen detoxification, vestibular reintegration, and neurofunctional regulation. Removing screens alone does not eliminate the reflex — it persists as part of screen trauma and requires targeted therapeutic intervention.
Screen-Induced Pathological Eye-Covering Reflex
A newly identified reflex observed in children with early screen addiction. When visual input is covered or blocked, the child exhibits an automatic, intense reaction — panic, screaming, motor agitation, tics, aggression, or self-harm. The reflex is not emotional but neurofunctional, triggered regardless of who performs the covering.
Neurofunctional Disruption
SIPECR reflects a deep disintegration of sensory regulation and visual–motor processing caused by early screen addiction. It does not appear in typically developing children and represents a specific marker of screen-induced neurotrauma.
Clinical Significance
The reflex strongly correlates with autistic-like features and sensory processing disorders, providing a new perspective on the connection between early screen addiction and developmental diagnoses.
Therapeutic Trajectory
SIPECR resolves fully only after structured therapy involving screen detoxification and sensory-motor reintegration. Removing screens alone is insufficient — the reflex persists as part of screen trauma and requires targeted neurofunctional restoration.
Screen-Induced Synesthesia (SIS)
A cross-modal sensory phenomenon observed in children with early screen addiction. The child assigns colours, sensations, movements, or emotional tones to sounds, images, letters, objects, or people. These reactions are automatic and neurofunctional, not imaginative or symbolic — they arise from altered neural connectivity shaped by early audiovisual overstimulation.
Neurofunctional Disruption
SIS reflects an abnormal persistence of cross-modal pathways that should normally be eliminated during early neurodevelopment. Continuous screen exposure in critical developmental windows prevents proper neural pruning and leads to excessive coupling between visual, auditory, and sensory networks. This creates a distorted hierarchy of sensory processing, with visual–auditory circuits dominating over language, motor, and social-cognitive systems.
Clinical Significance
Screen-induced synesthesia can resemble autistic-like traits: unusual sensory responses, idiosyncratic associations, rigid categorisations, atypical reactions to stimuli, and difficulties with symbolic communication. These manifestations may lead to misinterpretation or misdiagnosis as ASD, despite having a different neurobiological origin linked to screen addiction.
Therapeutic Trajectory
SIS subsides only after structured therapy targeting sensory reintegration, neural pruning, and restoration of typical network hierarchy. Screen removal alone does not resolve the phenomenon — the cross-modal connectivity remains as part of screen trauma and requires targeted neurofunctional intervention.
Screen-Induced Cue-Dependent Behavior (SICDB)
A behaviour pattern in which the child depends on specific audiovisual cues to initiate or complete essential actions — eating, sleeping, toileting, transitioning, cooperating, or performing routines. The behaviour is anchored to a stimulus (image, sound, position), and without that cue the child becomes blocked, distressed, or unable to proceed.
Neurofunctional Disruption
SICDB emerges from disrupted sensory regulation and associative learning caused by early screen addiction. The brain forms rigid stimulus–response chains driven by dominant audiovisual pathways, bypassing natural self-regulatory and executive functions. This creates mechanical, cue-locked behaviours instead of flexible, self-initiated actions.
Clinical Significance
Cue-dependent behaviours closely mimic stereotypies, rigid routines, ritualised patterns, and behavioural blocks often seen in ASD. Because these behaviours appear externally similar, children with screen-induced cue dependency are frequently misdiagnosed. In reality, the mechanisms stem from addiction-driven sensory anchoring, not from intrinsic neurodevelopmental disorder.
Therapeutic Trajectory
SICDB resolves fully only through structured therapy that removes the cue reliance and rebuilds autonomous, self-initiated behaviour. Screen detoxification, sensory-motor reintegration, and restoration of flexible regulation are required. Eliminating screens alone is insufficient — the cue anchoring persists and demands targeted neurofunctional reconstruction.
Screen-Induced Parental Dynamics & Munchausen-by-Proxy Patterns
Children with early screen addiction are often assigned severe, chronic, and “incurable” diagnoses such as ASD, ADHD, or global developmental delay. These diagnoses require continuous consultations, therapies, and specialist involvement, placing the child in a constant medical spotlight. This dynamic partially fulfills an unrecognized therapeutic need in the mother, who often struggles with depression, emotional instability, and autonomic dysregulation. In such cases, the child is not “untreatable” — the symptoms are maintained by the parent’s psychophysiological environment rather than by irreversible developmental pathology.
Dual-Therapy Model: Treating Both the Child and the Mother
True recovery occurs only when therapy addresses both sides of the dynamic. The child requires full screen detox, sensory-motor reintegration, and restoration of regulation and development. The mother needs therapeutic support that stabilizes her autonomic nervous system, reduces depressive symptoms, regulates emotional responses, and breaks her dependence on constant medical evaluations and diagnostic cycles. When the mother improves, the child’s symptoms diminish rapidly; when she remains untreated, the child stays in a chronic loop of dysfunction — even after screens are removed.
Paternal Screen Addiction and the Development of Early Screen Addiction in Children
Children with early screen addiction often come from families where the father has his own form of screen addiction — gaming, gambling, pornography consumption, or general compulsive screen use. Regardless of the specific type, the effect is the same: tolerance toward addiction, weakened emotional presence, disrupted family regulation, and the absence of a stable parental framework.
When the father functions in an addictive mode, the household loses predictability, boundaries, and emotional support. The child is exposed to screens as a substitute for connection and regulation — and develops early screen addiction, followed by neurofunctional trauma: sensory-motor fragmentation, autonomic dysregulation, language and social impairments, and behaviour resembling ASD/ADHD.
Therapeutic Direction
Effective therapy must address both the child — through detoxification, sensory-motor reintegration, and neurofunctional restoration — and the father, whose own screen addiction must be resolved in order to restore family regulation.
Screen time
Policies in Nurseries, Kindergartens & Schools
Across the world, policies on screen use in early childhood settings remain inconsistent, vague, and largely ineffective. Most countries rely on general recommendations rather than enforceable rules, and very few recognise the neurodevelopmental risks associated with early exposure. Despite growing scientific evidence, nurseries, kindergartens and schools continue to introduce digital media without clear safety standards or developmental justification.
Our Recommendations
0–3 years
Screen use should be completely eliminated. Early exposure functions as a form of psychophysical harm and disrupts foundational neurodevelopment.
Up to 9 years
There is no developmental benefit to screen use. The recommendation is zero use in all nurseries, kindergartens, and primary schools.
After 9 years
Screens may be introduced only in strictly eutonic ways — controlled, purposeful and limited. Hedonic (pleasure-driven) screen use should remain prohibited until 18, due to the high addiction risk.
Children with existing screen addiction
General “screen time guidelines” do not apply. These children require clinical assessment and individualised therapeutic planning, not standard limits.
Digital technology in schools
Digital tools should be implemented only after long-term experimental evaluation demonstrating measurable benefits and no health, developmental or neurofunctional risks.
Read our scientific journal
free
A scientific journal on the applied aspects of neuroscience.
A monthly publication on the emerging therapeutic art within the biofeedback paradigm.